Jurisprudence

Search every Luxembourg decision, not a sample of them

Clerk reads the full Luxembourg case law corpus, opens the decisions that apply to your matter, reads them in full, and cites each one to its public source. No keyword guesswork, no manual trawl through justice.public.lu.

The Luxembourg corpus Clerk works from

45,957decisions searched, end to end
In fullapplicable decisions opened and read, not skimmed
Publicevery citation linked to justice.public.lu
How the research works

An agent that does the legal reading for you

Clerk runs the search the way a diligent associate would, and shows its work at every step.

Searches the whole corpus

Clerk works across all 45,957 decisions — the Cour supérieure de justice, the tribunaux d'arrondissement, the Tribunal du travail and others — instead of a curated subset.

Opens what actually applies

It selects the decisions relevant to your facts, opens them, and sets aside the ones that don't fit — so you read what matters, not a results page.

Reads each one in full

Applicable decisions are read end to end, not matched on a keyword, so the reasoning behind a finding is captured, not just its headline.

Cites to the public source

Every decision Clerk relies on is cited to its public source on justice.public.lu, so you can open and verify it in one click.

No manual trawl

You stop paging through justice.public.lu by hand. Ask the question in plain language; Clerk does the trawl and brings back what holds.

Declares what it read

Each turn, Clerk states the decisions it actually opened — so its conclusions are tied to specific, named sources you can check.

See it work

From a plain-language question to grounded authority

Watch Clerk search the corpus, open the decisions that apply, and cite each one back to its source.

Clerk · Droit du travail · Licenciement

Mon client, cadre depuis 8 ans, a été licencié avec effet immédiat pour faute grave. Le licenciement est-il abusif ? Calcule les indemnités et trouve la jurisprudence.

Clerk
  1. Réflexion

    J’examine un licenciement avec effet immédiat pour faute grave après huit ans d’ancienneté. Je vérifie la procédure, j’apprécie la gravité de la faute, puis je chiffre les indemnités dues.

  2. Consultation de documents

    contrat_de_travail.pdfPDF
  3. Calcul des indemnités

    Préavis L.124-1 : 4 moisIndemnité de départ L.124-7 : 2 moisBase : 5 800 € brut
  4. Recherche dans la jurisprudence

    faute grave absences injustifiéesproportionnalité de la sanctioncharge de la preuve employeur
  5. Lecture d’une décision

    C.S.J., n° 145/23 — 14 mars 2023
  6. Réflexion

    La Cour exige une faute rendant immédiatement impossible la poursuite du contrat. De simples absences, sans avertissement préalable, sont rarement qualifiées de faute grave — le licenciement paraît abusif.

Grounding & integrity

Answers you can stand behind in front of a court

Research is only useful if you can rely on it. Clerk ties every conclusion to a specific decision it read, links that decision to its public source, and is explicit about the limits of what it found — so nothing rests on an unverifiable claim.

  • Declares the decisions it actually read each turn
  • Links every citation to its source on justice.public.lu
  • Flags any claim it couldn't ground in the corpus
  • No invented case names, numbers or holdings
Every citelinked to its public source on justice.public.lu

Jurisprudence questions

How much of the Luxembourg case law does Clerk cover?

Clerk searches the full corpus of 45,957 decisions, spanning the Cour supérieure de justice, the tribunaux d'arrondissement, the Tribunal du travail and others. It searches across all of them rather than a curated selection.

Does Clerk just match keywords?

No. Clerk searches the corpus to find the decisions relevant to your facts, then opens and reads the applicable ones in full — so it captures the reasoning, not just a surface keyword match.

Can I verify the cases it cites?

Yes. Every decision Clerk relies on is cited to its public source on justice.public.lu, so you can open the original and check it yourself.

How do I know which decisions Clerk actually read?

Each turn, Clerk declares the decisions it opened and read. Its conclusions are tied to those named sources, so you always know what the answer rests on.

What happens if it can't find supporting authority?

Clerk flags any claim it couldn't ground in the corpus rather than presenting it as settled. It won't invent case names, numbers or holdings to fill a gap.

Do I still need to search justice.public.lu myself?

No manual trawl is required. You ask the question in plain language and Clerk does the searching and reading, then hands back grounded, source-linked authority.

Put the whole Luxembourg case law on the matter

Searched in full, read where it counts, cited to source — then turn the research straight into drafting.